Here’s a sentence that sounds like a contradiction: bitcoin has produced some of the best long-run returns of any asset over the past decade, and it has also spent stretches of multiple years down 70% or more from a peak. Both are true. Holding them together in your head is the entire skill of owning it, and the sleep test I’ve written about before is how I hold them together in practice.
A bear market is when you find out what that test was actually measuring. Short version: it was never measuring courage. It’s measuring size.
Using widely cited cycle peaks and troughs, bitcoin’s major drawdowns have looked roughly like this:
| Cycle | Approximate peak-to-trough | How long underwater felt |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | About -90% | Months, but brutal |
| 2013–2015 | About -85% | Roughly two years |
| 2017–2018 | About -84% | Roughly a year to the low |
| 2021–2022 | About -77% | Over a year, plus the 2022 contagion |
The exact percentages vary by which exchange data you use — the early markets were messy — but the shape is consistent: declines of 70–85% from a cycle peak have happened more than once per decade, and each one took a long time to crawl out of. If you own bitcoin, you should be able to say “an 80% drawdown is inside the historical range” out loud without flinching. If you can’t say it, the honest response isn’t courage. It’s a smaller position.
The test: hold a position small enough that an 80% decline wouldn’t change your plans, your bills, or your temperament. Here’s what that looks like on a hypothetical $100,000 portfolio:
| Bitcoin position | Value at -80% | Dollar loss | Loss as % of portfolio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% ($1,000) | $200 | $800 | 0.8% |
| 3% ($3,000) | $600 | $2,400 | 2.4% |
| 5% ($5,000) | $1,000 | $4,000 | 4.0% |
| 10% ($10,000) | $2,000 | $8,000 | 8.0% |
An 80% drop in a 3% position costs 2.4% of the portfolio — the kind of drawdown a plain stock index fund produces in a bad year. At 10%, you’ve manufactured your own personal bear market inside the bear market, and no amount of conviction helps you hold through that if the dollar amount touches a nerve.
There’s an asymmetry hiding in these numbers too, and it’s the reason selling in a crash is so destructive. To get back to even from a 70% loss, you need a 233% gain (0.30 → 1.00 requires tripling plus a third). From an 80% loss, you need 400%. The deeper the hole, the more the recovery math tilts against you — which is exactly why the decision that matters most happens before the crash, in position sizing, and almost never during it.
Do this once, tonight, in writing. Three steps, five minutes:
If the answer is no, your size is probably sane. If the answer is yes, trim until the answer is no. That’s it. That’s the whole exercise, and it’s worth more than a hundred articles about conviction.
The sizing test is what the sleep test actually checks. But there are two secondary tests a real bear market runs, and both can be prepared for:
One decision worth making in advance: what happens when the position grows? A 3% bitcoin allocation can drift to 6% during a strong run, and suddenly the same 80% drawdown costs more than double the original plan. The fix is mechanical and unemotional — rebalancing bands. If your rule is “hold 3%, rebalance when it drifts beyond 5%,” then a bull market forces you to trim gains and a bear market forces you to top up. Both directions are automatic, and neither requires an opinion about where price is headed.
The math of why this works in a bear market specifically: after a drawdown, the remaining position is smaller, so any rule-driven top-up buys more units per dollar. That’s not a prediction that the asset recovers — it’s just arithmetic on the price you paid versus the price you’re paying now. People who rebalanced through previous cycles describe the same experience: the selling in euphoria felt uncomfortable, the buying in despair felt worse, and both were the reason the position stayed inside the size they could actually hold.
Whatever band you pick, write it down with the position size. A band without a written size becomes a vibe the moment price is down 60%, and vibes are how 3% positions quietly become 12% positions through pure neglect.
Not advice — a range to think inside. Plenty of long-term holders land somewhere between 1% and 5% of investable assets, sized so the full 80% haircut is a number they can shrug at. Above that, you’re no longer making an investment decision; you’re making a personality decision about whether you’re the person who can watch -77% without flinching, and most people — including people who are sure they can — are wrong about themselves the first time. The sizing frameworks and rebalancing bands in that post are the practical version of this.
I’m not a financial advisor, bitcoin is volatile, and nothing here is a recommendation to buy or hold it. This is a framework for deciding how much of it you can carry before the next bad stretch arrives — because historically, one always does.
Forward step: run the three-step exercise above and write the two numbers down — what you own, and what it’s worth at -80%. Tape that second number somewhere you’ll see it. Then read the original sleep test post and see whether your written number survives it.
Your whole financial plan fits on one page: accounts with jobs, automation rules, insurance, three…
Where crypto yield actually comes from, what the 2022 platform failures cost depositors, and the…
A century of drawdowns in one table, from -22% in a day to -89% over…
February 2024 financial freedom update: real income numbers, portfolio moves, and lessons from our family's…
Rebalancing is risk control, not a return strategy. Bands, calendars, and the cash-flow method that…
Total US, total international, total bonds: what each piece does, the 60/30/10 cost math, and…
This website uses cookies.