Index Funds vs Individual Stocks: I Kept Score for Two Years

I wanted to be the guy who picks winners. I read the annual reports. I had opinions about management teams. I felt smart.

Then I did the one thing most stock pickers never do: I kept an honest scoreboard against a boring index fund, and I looked at it after two years.

Not financial advice – this is my personal approach and my own results. I’m not telling you what to buy. Do your own research.

Some links below are affiliate/referral links — I may earn a commission or bonus at no cost to you.

What Each One Actually Is

An individual stock is a share of one company. Your outcome is tied to that one business – its management, its industry, its debt, its luck.

An index fund is a single fund that holds hundreds or thousands of companies in fixed proportions, tracking a published index rather than trying to beat it. Buy one broad-market index fund and you own a slice of an enormous number of businesses in one transaction, for a fee often measured in hundredths of a percent.

Here’s the part beginners rarely have framed for them: the index isn’t the safe, mediocre option and stock picking the ambitious one. The index is the average of all those picks, minus almost no cost. To beat it, you have to be better than the collective judgment of everyone doing this professionally, after fees, repeatedly.

My Scoreboard, Honestly

Over two years of picking, I had genuine wins. Two positions did really well and I told everyone about them, because of course I did.

What the scoreboard showed was that my wins were roughly cancelled by the picks I’d quietly stopped mentioning, and after all of it I landed close to where a plain broad-market index fund would have put me – slightly behind it, actually, once I counted the trades I made at the wrong times.

Two years isn’t a statistically meaningful sample and I won’t pretend it is. But it was enough to make me ask a better question: not “can I beat the index?” but “what would I need to believe about myself to bet decades of savings on beating it?”

That question is what actually moved me. The broader research is not kind to stock pickers – over long periods, the majority of professional active managers fail to beat their benchmark after fees. Those are people doing this full time with research teams. I was doing it after work.

The Two Hidden Costs of Picking

Fees compound against you exactly like returns compound for you. Say you invest $500 a month for 30 years. At 8% you end up around $745,000. Run the same thing at 7.25% – what you’d get if roughly three quarters of a percent leaked out annually to fees and costs – and you land near $641,000.

That’s about $104,000 for a difference you’d barely notice on a statement. I ran the full version of this math in what compound growth actually looks like decade by decade, and the fee side of it was the number that made me flinch.

Attention is the cost nobody prices. When you hold individual companies, you have to keep holding an opinion. Earnings, news cycles, the urge to check the app at dinner. I was spending real mental bandwidth on it – bandwidth that, honestly, was worth more pointed at earning more money than at guessing which company would do well.

That was the same realization I had about rental property, which is why I ended up selling the rental to buy index funds. It wasn’t that the asset was bad. It was that the version of me managing it was spending attention I wanted back.

Where Individual Stocks Do Make Sense to Me

I’m not anti-stock-picking, and I don’t think anyone should pretend the fun doesn’t matter. Here’s the honest case for it:

• Learning. Owning one company teaches you how to read a business in a way index funds never will. That’s real education.
• Conviction you can actually defend. If you genuinely understand an industry because you work in it, you know things the average holder doesn’t. That’s a legitimate edge – it’s just narrower than most people think.
• It scratches the itch. If picking a few names is what keeps you engaged instead of bailing on investing entirely, that engagement has value.

The compromise I settled on: the overwhelming majority of my long-term money goes into broad, low-cost index funds on autopilot, and a small carved-out slice is money I’m fully prepared to lose on individual ideas. The slice is small enough that being wrong is a lesson, not a setback.

The rule I hold myself to is that the slice never gets refilled from the boring money. If it shrinks, it shrinks.

What I’d Tell Someone Starting This Week

If you’re at the beginning, the sequence that would have saved me two years:

1. Get the automatic thing running first. Broad, low-cost, regular contributions, no decisions required. Mine is a monthly transfer into a broad index fund at Schwab, and the only decision I ever made about it was the first one. Boring on purpose.
2. Check the expense ratio before anything else. It’s the one number about a fund you can know with certainty in advance. Future returns are a guess; fees are a fact.
3. Only then add a play-money sleeve, if you want one. Cap it. Write the cap down.
4. Keep a real scoreboard. Compare your picks to what a plain index fund would have done over the same period. Not vibes – actual numbers. I keep mine in Empower because it holds every account in one view, but a spreadsheet works exactly as well.

That fourth step is the one everybody skips, and it’s the one that gives you an answer instead of a story. Most people remember their winners and forget the rest, which is how you can lose to the average for years while feeling like you’re beating it.

The Actual Point

The reason I care about this isn’t purity about investing style. It’s that picking stocks was a distraction from the two things that actually moved my net worth: the gap between what I earned and what I spent, and how consistently I invested that gap.

Index funds didn’t make me rich. They made investing a non-decision so I could spend my energy on the parts I could control. That’s the same reasoning behind why I just buy index funds even as a real estate investor, and it’s one of the plainer items on my list of the rules of making money.

Keep the scoreboard. Whatever it says, you’ll be making decisions with evidence instead of ego – and that’s most of the skill.